Uganda: Don't Impose Circumcision On Natives! - The Monitor

So interesting and laughable, I first dismissed it as Mickey Mouse. Never did I expect circumcision to become a national policy, leave alone an 'international arsenal' in the war against HIV/Aids. Modern scientific research risks losing relevance through half-measures and conflicting theories.

Author: rich

I'm afraid its not laughable at all. It will inevitably be inflicted on non-consenting children. Even here in the states it's most commonly done on newborn boys without anesthetic!

Take a look at what's lost, and what's "gained": http://www.math.missouri.edu/~rich/MGM/primer.html

Don't repeat the mistakes of the USA. We're just now starting to admit to the destructive effects of this quackery.

Author: Hugh7

It's very odd how an invitation-only meeting (of whom? they don't say) in Switzerland decided on this policy for all of Africa, on the basis of three non-blind trials conducted by circumcision-enthusiasts, that were cut short after 21 months. They keep saying circumcision cuts HIV by 50%. What they don't say is that it would take 55 circumcisions to prevent one HIV transmission in Uganda, on average. The non-circumcised control group in Uganda got less HIV than the circumcised experimental group in Kenya, so whatever you're doing in Uganda already (probably "zero grazing") works better than circumcision.



Faites d'allAfrica.com votre page d'accueil | Fils RSS

Début de page | English Site | Plan du Site | Qui Nous Sommes | Publicité | Recherche | Abonnement

Copyright © 2008 AllAfrica Global Media.

Un commentaire? Remplissez le formulaire. Données Personnelles .

HOME
allAfrica.com


Régions