The Analyst (Monrovia)
28 Octobre 2008
It's more than a year since Charles Taylor was bundled up and sent to The Hague to face the 11-count indictment for war crimes and crimes against humanity brought against him by the Special Hybrid Court for Sierra Leone.
[ See Article ]
Abstracting from all nuances of the discipline of jurisprudence, your logic is broadly sound, but narrowly flawed: this is not a case of all or nothing. Personally, I think that the soupist Tejan Kabba should also be charged with crimes against humanity: his support of the so-called Kamajors, who engaged in the same genre of atrocities as the RUF and others, reasonably supports such an indictment. I agree that Taylor is not the only "Dr. Death." Kabba and other soupists in the criminal organization called the SLPP may be viewed as Doctors of Death too.
And, one should not forget the opportunists---all soupists are supreme opportunists--- who have morphed from green to red, to hang their 'political' profiteering with the silly and immature 'leadership' of the supreme soupist of the occupier soupist party, the APC: EBK, as they call him; a leader with no vision: all soupists are blind to the nihilistic consequences of their political machinations.
Moreover, this historical re-flection parading as juridical adjudication serves no purpose. It is closer to welfare for lawyers, than a search for "justice," a concept as elusive as African 'politics.'
Expanding the thrust of your argument, I should think that the leaders of the soupist APC, SLPP, and others during the relevant historical period should be sitting with Taylor at the defense table at the Hague.
Hence, the proposition that Taylor's prosecution is selective is reasonably affirmable on the evidence, an injustice under any rational juridical theoretical projection.
Injustice parading as justice: an axiom of African political theory and practice, think you not? But, then again, soupist 'politics' is no more and no less that a theater of lethal absurdity.
SELECTIVE PROSECUTION: NOW IN THE USA
The recent conviction of Taylor's son of "terrorism" in the US may be defensible on the evidence and legal presumptions and fictions supporting the same; however, is it reasonable to assume that the United States Authoritites CANNOT identify, charge and prosecute Sierra Leone soupists living in the US whose acts during the relevant historical period are precisely the same as those of Taylor's son?
A seasoned prosecutor may begin with the soupist rule of Siaka Stevens, Albert Margai, and similar oddities in the history of political terrorism.
Followers of the same, fairly categorizable in the colors of Taylor's son, now live in the USA, and some are even 'citizens.' More Targets: members of the RUF and the AFRC are here, right here in the USA, and only a historico-logical challenged observer would bother to 'argue' that these "terrorists" are not unarguably analogical to Taylor's son.
I need not mention the leadership of the current criminal occupier soupist party in soupist enslaved Sierra Leone: The All Peoples Congress. Therein terror rocks and rolls, as the news reports arguable show.
Indeed, it may be urged that supporters of the criminal soupist SLPP and APC living in the USA ("maroons," in my lexicon) are co-conspirators, by and through their material and 'theoretical' support of these cancerous criminal entities in the territory of Sierra Leone of TERRORISM, AND ONE CAN EASILY IDENTIFY THESE SUPPORTERS by reading the rags of these criminal organizations in the USA: COCORIOKO, THE NEW PEOPLE and AWARENESS TIMES, reprehensible mouthpieces of these uncouth and violent political 'parties,' thieving occupiers of the territory of Sierra Leone and its enslaved neo-modern inhabitants, enslavers of a peoples without a NATION, for Sierra Leone is NOT a nation in any meaningful sense.
Jallohlaw;
Just checking, I observed in your response to zotta's you mentioned "OTHERS" three times without an operant defination telling the readers who are the "OTHERS" You specifically identified Tejan Kabba, the Kamajors, RUF, APC, EBK and the SLPP. In Zotta's comment I think he wrote about ULIMO and LURD but you failed to mentioned either one.
Jalloh, ULIMO and LURD are synonym, many ponders may think that is the reason why their names were not mentioned. Instead, you referred to them as "OTHERS".
Please excuse the ambiguity or strategic evasion. Accordingly, ULIMO AND LURD, then, or ULIMO OR LURD, AND OTHER SOUPIST OCCUPIER entities in the occupied territories of Liberia and Sierra Leone.
I hope this is helpful.
I have not heard from soupists from COCORIOKO AND AWARENESS TIMES, and thanks to the stringent discursive-interactive rules of allafrica.com, I don't expect them to post here, SINCE THE SIERRA LEONE SOUPIST signature, THE MAMIE CUSS, is FUNDAMENTALLY, RIGIDLY AND DOGMATICALY VERBOTTEN HEREIN.
Cheers, my friend.
ONCE AGAIN ON SELECTIVE PROSECUTION.
The obscurantist, xenophobe John Leigh, a kamgbay krio, according to some, should also be in the dock with Taylor, along with Tejan Kabba. If Kabba is to be docked, as I have advocatged, so should John Leigh, the former soupist Ambassador of Sierra Leone to the USA during the criminal, soupist regime of Kabba.
He claims he was anti-RUF, AFRC, bla, bla, bla. I guess he was not anti-Kamajor. He supported the Kamajors, styling with the soupist Kabba.
Accordingly, since there is no difference in my historical and categorical memory between the barbarism of the RUF and the Kamajors, Leigh, under this empirico-logical construction, is also a possible defendant in a prosecution sounding in crimes against humanity at the Hague.
If Leigh, who is obsessed with one Sylvia Blyden, editor of another soupist paper, Awareness Times, disagrees, then let him respond HERE, NOT AT THE RAG COCORIOKO.
I await his reasoned response; and please hold back the gutter language that constitutes the lexicon de jour and jedes Tagen at the soupist, obscurantist rag, COCORIOKO.
LEMMAS OF SELECTIVE PROSECUTION
The theme of selective prosecution suggests the expansion of the discourse: vile traits of the cultural traditions of soupist occupied Sierra Leone.
1. Tribalism: The culture is suffocated by soupist whipped phony tribalism. Mendes v. Temnes, to name the main protagonists or, to the precise, proxies of the ideological interests of soupists.
For example, the soupist rag COCORIOKO is RIGHTLY experiencing a mass exodus of some Mendes and others because the toxic tribalist, obscurantist and Doctor of the mammy cuss, one Curtis Thomsas, now banned from publishing thereat his KKK and Nazi attacks on Mendes by calling them cannibals, and relying on the literature of European 'historians.' Historical naivete, you say; nay, historical boneheadedness, I say, peppered with lethal another signature of the cultural traditions of soupist occupied Sierra Leone: bad hat.
I have invited the obscurantist Thomas to a debate on this august site; when he does, he will be mami cussing, and everybody knows what will happen then.
2. Guess who is fanning the xenophobic flames of tribalism? Sierra Leonean maroons in the USA, mouthpieces of their soupist masters in Freesmell, as some critics call the capital of soupist occupied Sierra Leone.
3. Now, let's get over this juvenile, yet lethal APC/SLPP lie, lie rivalry.
You guessed it: Same soup; same bita tase.
May I prophesize that the days of Soupism in the occcupied territory of Sierra Leone are numbered? If only, if only, the sub-altern, neo-modern subjugated inhabitants of that God forsaken land would raise their voices and demand: RESPECT, to sample Aretha, for their souls, and all souls, according to the Book Religions, are equally loved by "God."
Accordingly, SOUPISM is atheism; so is 'tribalism.'
Kindest Felicitations from the hammer that will bury soupism : VOX POPULI.
PHONY WAR BETWEEN TWO PHONY SOUPIST MOUTHPIECES IN THE USA.
The "New People," an online mouthpiece for the soupist SLPP, and "Cocorioko", an online mouthpiece of the soupist APC are each engaged in editor bashing: The New People calls the editor of Cocorioko, one Kabs Kanu, an "APC Idioter," while the alleged Idioter riposts with " Ah fine pass dem," calling the soupists at the New People "scumbags."
In my opinion, these maroons, always circling in the boring alleged antagonism between Mendes and their allies and Temnes and their allies ARE ALL OF THE SAME ILK: proxies of the proxies in soupist occupied Sierra Leone.
You fool no one by pretending that you re-present "the national interest" or "one people" or whatever obscurantist lexeme you choose to efface your transparent mendacity.
Of course, the soupist "Awareness Times," presssured by the soupist APC thuggish machine, is not a player anymore, perhaps because of unpricipled opportunism. Under the pretext of 'sanitzing its Discussion Forum' the editor pitifully kow towed to the the APC terror machine, even if it comes from the First Soupist Lady.
Thus, the Reflective Opposition in Exile advises thus: Get lost, soupist rags! The sub-altern captured inhabitants of Soupist occupied Sierra Leone are sick and tired of your uncouth tribalism, and---IMAGINE---YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE BOOKMEN AND BOOKWOMEN.
Cheers.
THE SHAME OF SIERRA LEONE: COCORIOKO
I urge all self-respecting Sierra Leoneans to denounce the editior of that pit of verbal toxicity for permitting the display of human verbal indecency in his Forum. CORCORIOKO, the worst rag in planet cyber.
I name names: Kabs-kanu has created a site for all kinds of degenerates, and by and large, Sierra Leoneans are degenerates.
Go there now: you will see mama cussing towering beyond Mount Kilmanjaro; charges of Mende cannibalism, orchestrated by the uncouth xenophobe, Kamgbay Krio, according to some critics, one Curtis Thomas, the worst writer ever to leave the shores of soupist occupied Sierra Leone.
No wonder, intelligent and morally robust contributors such as Braeviable and others bolted from the infamous house of mami cussing: the soupist mouthpiece of the criminal occupier APC thug party.
To be fair, thuggism, contrary to SLPP soupists, started with Milton, and his ruthless broher Albert, and Stevens, the master of political intrigue, merely played the coda to a territory founded on the lie of a nation.
THAT is the root of soupism; and I condemn it.
No wonder, Sierra Leone is country number zero, according the Doctrine of Soupism and the United Nations.
And, you wonder, what the fuss is about? Why, money; it has always been about money: not tribalism or other excuses for raiding the treasury.
MONEY, MONEY, AND MONEY: honest people earn it; soupists, proxies, and proxies of proxies in the US and the UK STEAL it.
How much longer will the demoralized denizens, sub-altern tout court captured inahabitants of that God forsaken wasteland take this soupist crap?
Kindest Felicitations.
Mr Rapp for your information, in a criminal case the defendent is guilty beyound all reasonable doubts. The defense team is not disputing the fact that wicked things didn't happened to civillians, but the Prosecution has not yet shown any hard fact directly likinig Taylor to atrocities in Sierra Leone. The Sierra Leone Army (SLA), ULIMO, LURD, and RUF they all had Liberian rebels fighting in Sierra Leone at some point. Those Liberian rebels that were hired by President Kabba (SLA) committed atrocities along with their Sierra Leone counterparts. A statement by Kabba when he testified in Sierra Leone at the special court. Also, the prosecution witnesses have also testified that ULIMO, LURD and the RUF also committed atrocities. So, the whole thing is a mess, as a result, by grabbing Taylor as the Dr. of death and atrocities is beyound any reasonable prudent person's comprehension. Fortunately, this is not a civil case by means of which the defendent is guilty base on the Preponderance of the evidence.
Consequently, I join hands with QC Griffiths to debunk the prosecution case as "RUBBISH". If politics is removed from this trial, which many see it to be impossible, and let justice prevail, and let the chips fall wherever they may, Taylor is going to walk.