I think this Editorial or article if I may say in some sense is somehow onesided. If the SLPP had all this methods in place, how come for this to change suddenly in lessthan one year? If i may suggest, can we try to find out what is the cause for the introduction for more school going for the After Noon Shifts? Are there more empty classrooms in all the schools to accomodate those After Noon Shift Students(I mean Schools with the After Noon Shift)? Concord Times,you are my Newspaper and Pel, you are my Journalist of the Year,but let's check the facts. I am not anyones party Man.All I want is a good Mama Salone.

What nation? Sierra Leone is a nation? If it is, then explain why, after all these years after that sham independence from British autocracy soupists are still stammering the slogan "nation building"?

APC en SLPP na wan. You get it, dude? And, the unity of this surreptitious, lie, lie, difference, you ponder?

Why, everybody knows, above all the soupists themselves: RAID THE TREASURY!

Whose treasury, you ask? Certainly, not that of the 'nation' of Sierra Leone, for there ain't no such "tin," but that of the soupist captured territory of Sierra Leone, which was mediated by British imperialism when it helped make THE GEEZER FOX Milton Margai "prime minister."

He was, of course, a soupist: essentially, therefore, a tail of British Imperialism, which never left its captured territory.

Soupists are proxies of British imperialism.

Accordingly, the 'nation' of Sierra Leone, MY FOOT.

dude, if your foot was mama salone them it was meaningless for the British to scramble for that foot. We migth all sit today and enjoy the comfort of the West, Asia or Africa, where it is peaceful, but let's not forget that your so-called foot was once Sierra Leone where you started to learn the very English that you are today proud to pen down on billboards and newspapers.Only,if you will tell me that you are amongs those who came with silver spoons in their mouths.For now let's limit my mama salone and your mama salone to that of a Nation. "kuda afis" dude.

Homey, I appreciate your dearth of an intuitive grasp of literary irony. Irony piggybacking on irony, I suppose.

Again, and now everbody: "Sierra Leone is NOT a nation."

I suppose that the Brits are no bamos: they came, conquered and stole big time. Then, they installed their puppets: the soupists---from Milton the fox to EBK the fool.

Pray tell, what RELATION subsists between my use of the English Language and my political characterization of Sierra Leone as a soupist occupied territory; and, that it ain't no nation, black?

En passant, I did not "learn" THE English I NOW use in Sierra Leone, and I do not speak or write English like a Salonman or a Brit.

Accordingly, get over your language thing, in the name of Holy Zeus! Black.

Oh! "kortor" are you still there flying with your hanki-pank wings? If you don't write like a Saloneman,then I suggest "Attitudinal Change" should be your 24hrs treatment. Cause, I have been following your comments on most of the articles. Don't only blame others,suggest a method for a change, if there is any that you have.For us we are still proxies of the British. Lend me your pen again for another reply. "yoy o u fof oo lol Kuda afis".

Dude, if you confirm that your locution "Kortor" carries xenophobic implicative undertones against the Fulbe people, may I suggest that you cease and desist from deploying that category, for it may be construed by the editiors of allafrica.com as a clear contravention of the policies of this site.

You can do that kind of thing at Cocorioko or Awareness times. Lonta: not here.

Now, you suggest "acchichidunal change", an obscurantist heuristic or nonsense posited by the soupist insurance hustler turned soupist President of the the soupist occupied territory of Sierra Leone: EBK, the buffoon.

Moreover, you misunderstand my theoretical web: soupists, and I hope you are not a soupist, are not proxies.

No: they are PROXIES OF PROXIES, PROXIES TO THE SECOND EXPONENT.

Finally, you seek advice from me on how to change soupism? Incredible!

Isn't my answer obvious? You should be able to DEDUCE my policy recommendation if you have understood my posts.

Cheers, me bra.

First of all, may I remind you that every human being created by Allah are of my people also. I do not know the word "xenophobia" because it is never part of my daily "Queen's Language" If you feel the word "kortor" is xenophobic in nature and clearly threathen the very existence of the Fulbe people, who are also my people, then proudly recommend for this site to question me on my style.You should be pretty proud for me to say this word to you. all I want you to do is to get real.Always retrospect on their past to correct their present, if they are going astray.Now ask me for the meaning of "KORTOR" "moi drugge parkar or dusbedania"

No problem; it's all good.

Cheers from Camp Fulbe Anti-Soupism.

Brother, never in your life be afraid of anyone to tell them the truth,but you must be afraid to continue telling lies in the midst of the Almighty Allah. We are the eyes,the ears and the mouths of the anti-soupist in Africa. We must change the way Africa and Africans are been handled by some of their Leaders. Our voices and pens will change some of them. If they don't, we'll call them to public forums and we'll pin them with questions that they can't escape. Yes Freedom...

My Brother in the fight to the death against soupism, we are on the same page: I have set up in United States and the UK a REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION.

Now, I appreciate your efforts, better, the Movement does. Glory to your valor! I am not in Freesmell; accordingly, I must defer to your assessment of the real conditions in soupist occupied Sierra Leone.

Hence, my Guerre is purely rhetorical, a rhetoric founded on deep theoretical reflection, however.

My brother, may I invite you to visit the Gambian Discussion Section? There, you'll find, besides the gibberish of a soupist takam from behen, an attempt by a infamous, chicken Freesmell 'journalist', known for touting her 'IQ,' make a fool of herself: the 'journalist' who supported the soupist tiffy, tiffy Kabba and Berewa pot belleh after hefty 'internet' contracts were ILLEGALLY DELIVERED ON HER ROKOTO.

She was in Dubai recently with the First Soupist Lady, hat in hand. I hope Zain is not rocking with them, for I can demolish in a nanosec Zain's base in the UAE.

It is high time that the soupist femme be put in her place: the sewer of soupism.

Your take, respectfully?

Dear Sir,

Thank you for bringing to our attention the world travels of one of the region’s most infamous “journalists” – she certainly does keep herself busy! Her frequent flier miles must be adding up quite quickly.

As part of my own bumbling effort to process and sort out facts from fictions, truths from rumors, could you please briefly address or respond to the allegation made in the 4/29/08 issue of Cocorioko that the aforementioned “journalist” and you (or one using your “moniker”) are actually the same person?

Thank you and kindest felicitations.

My dear friend and brother in reflection, I am more indebted to you than you are to me.

You, if you'd recall, exposed the subject of interest, to borrow a Yankee turn of phrase, in the highly sophisticated Kenyan or Zimbabwean Discussion Sections.

Assuming the name you dropped in your post in one of those sites attaches to the "region's most infamous "journalists", my answer to your question is that the moniker 'jallohlaw' has never been used by the "infamous 'journalist,'" AS FAR AS I KNOW.

But, then again....

I hope you'd accept my humble invitation to you to visit the Gambian Disscussion Section, where "the infamous journalist," writing, approriately, under the moniker "mrsoupism," is making a donkey out of her SOUPIST ROKOTO.

HEART FELT REGARDS AND HIGHEST FELICITATIONS.

PS. I HOPE NOW THAT THE TRUTH HAS OFFED ABOUT THAT WEBSITE THAT USED US TO ADVANCE THE ... SOUPIST'S PECUNIARY AND OTHER MORBID INTERESTS, THAT ALL IS FORGIVEN, AND IN THAT SPIRIT, I EXTEND A WARM HAND OF FRIENDSHIP TO YOU SIR.

TRANSCENDENTAL CONSITITUTIVE CONSTITUTION OF SOUPISM AS A PURE PHENOMENON OF AN INTERSUBJECTIVE EIDOS TRANSCENDENTAL EGO (PART ONE)

FIRST, let me say that I am not a "follower" of Edmund Husserl, the founder of transcendental constitituive phenomenology, which is to be contrasted with the "hermeneutical phenomenology" of the Nazi, Martin Heidegger and the 'phenomenology' of the irrationalist, cut and paste Jean Paul Satre.

I view transcendental phenomenology as a research program, and Husserl's opus is a mere stepping stone in phenomenological research. In fact, Husserl, was flat wrong in many of his phenomenological descriptions, and truth be told, he WAS an IDEALIST, thanks to the influence neo-Kantians.

Methodologically founded transcendental constitutive phenomenology transcends both idealism and so-called realism, for both attitudes are mere aspects of an uncritical appropriation of a necessary fissure in the human condition: the fact that we are both subjects FOR the world and subjects IN the world: the PARADOX OF SUBJECTIVITY.

Since philosophy from Plato to whoever was unaware of this monumental, UNAAVOIDABLE, AND THUS EIDETIC OR ESSENTIAL paradox that HANGS ON HUMAN EXISTENCE like a monkey, it follows that pre-phenomenological philosophy is naive: flat wrong.

Now, to the task at hand: phenomenon soupism.

What is the eidetic, essential structure of this phenomenon, for phenomenology, properly construed, unlike the naive attitude of the sciences---natural or human---does not deal with FACTS? It rocks in the domaine of "essential structures," "ideal strutures.

Accordingly, what is the ideal structure of soupism?

EIDETIC VARIATION

WHEN I GRASP THE phenomena APC AND SLPP as pure phenomena of my consciousness, I grasp a manifold of determinations: names, deeds, coups, etc. When I 'run' the mentioned determinations through my imagination through the phenomena in the previous sentence, they remain the same: political parties, which I can freely idealize into a structure: phenomenon '

Then I notice in an oblique phenomenological intuition that this phenomenon is rather strange: it appears as an undifferntiated identity, i.e. an abyss of darkness.

There is thus a problem: I cannot think of an identity without a horizon; a phenomenon is always and everywhere, even under the naivete of the natural sciences, given within an inner and outer horizon.

As I probe---still within my imaginative variation---phenomenon , I see, in the flesh, that a structure emerge: policies. Reduced to its essence a policy is a directive: what to do next, given this or that circumstance.

Now, I firmly grasp this structure, and no matter what contingent determinations I 'throw' on the the same, it remains the same. Hence, it is an eidetic, essential determination.

I can then confidently assert that the phenomenon is one-sidedly founded in the phenomenon .

I now make a transition from the realm of constitutive transcendental phenomenology to a phenomenological theory of HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, which methodologically enables me to talk about FACTS.

Skipping many bone dry explications, I see that APC and SLPP are cultural second order wholes. Second order wholes---churches, mosques, the family, etc---are given in modus DIFFERENCE UNDER THE HORIZON OF THE IDENTITY OF SOCIAL UTILITLY OR FUNCIONAL SOCIAL ADEQUACY.

Thus, I am constrained to rivet my phenomenological DESCRIPTIVE gaze, albeit naive and seeped in the the everyday world, "the natural attitude," on the APC and SLPP as FACTS.

Reflecting naively, I see that these are not really FACTS; RATHER THEY ARE one FACT, IDENTICAL IN EVERY SUBSTANTIVE ASPECT: a granite identity emerges.

And, what is the name of that granite operational determination of that identity?

RAID THE TREASURY.

SOUPISM EMERGES AS THE UNITY OF THE EPHEMERAL 'DIFFERENCES' BETWEEN THE APC AND THE SLPP ('TRIBES', 'REGIONAL DIVIDE' AND OTHER OBFUSCATIVE HOKUM BUNKUM).

THEY ARE IDENTICAL in what matters in political interactions: money, for power, however mystified by the political theorists, for the politican reduces to cash, benjamins, whatever.

Hence, ALL SOUPISTS ARE THIEVES, AND THIS EMPIRICAL DETERMINATION SEDIMENTS THE IDENTITY OF THE APC AND SLPP.

HENCE, YOU ALWAYS GET THE SAME BITA TASE FROM THE SOUPISTS: THE HUSTLE OF DIFFERECE INSUBSTANTIAL; DIFFERENCE MEANT TO DECEIVE; DIFFERENCE THAT REDUCES TO POLITICAL AND MORAL DECADENCE.

Issued in the name of the REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE

TRANSITION TO THE DETERMINATION OF THE INTERSUBJECTIVE EIDOS SOUPIST EGO BY AND THROUGH SOME CONSIDERATIONS OF A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF UNDERSTANDING

In my previous post, I concluded that soupism is complete moral bankrutpcy. In my popular posts I refer to this fact as the tiffy tiffy syndrome: all soupists, from Milton, the fox, to EBK, the moron, are morally bankrupt: thieves. (For the technical foundation, see the post supra).

I now seek the cultural determinants of this interpretation of soupism in a phenomenological theory of human understanding.

Abstracting from all philosophical crap, I suggest that human life is anchored in the problem of the theoretical possibility of understanding ONE ANOTHER. Hence, there is the problem of understanding, misunderstanding and unwillingness to understand. This problem leads directly to the problem of the other: beginning with sub-human types---animals and human infants, who, obviously, have to be humanized by and through CULTURAL TRADITIONS.

The questions of how understanding is possible---that it is actual will be denied by only silly 'philosophers'---and how the Other (person) is accessible {"given") to me, as a member of a cultural community or Lebenswelt must, therefore, be answered in any explication of a cultural phenomenon such as SOUPISM.

I address these questions in the next RELATED post.

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED BY THE REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE

MEMORANDUM TO GOALPOST FROM THE REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE.

Would that you had the brains to practice your your profession: a physician. A journalist, you are not. Heck, you can't even write.

Would that you disabuse yourself of the delusionary thought that you are the incarnation of the obscurantist, methodologically naive author and so-called social activist, Edward Blyden, a bourgeois, please the 'white man' 'African'. (I have read all his books, and I say "trash, trash, and trash").

Imagine, a physician believes in "incarnation." Physician, my rokoto.

No wonder soupist elites high fly it to London or Washington when they have a cough.

As for your feminist delusions, I say: hokum bunkum. You wanna be a 'feminist' in Africa?

Dumbeh.

Why, 'feminism' is a corpse in the West. Anachronism galore, then.

The blokes you assume you bully in Freesmell by your hocus pocus will get you soon, very soon, and then you'll cry "uncle," sorry titi.

If you don't believe me, wait: you will go under, sooner than your swift flip flops in zone 'politics.'

But we, the Reflective Anti-Soupist Opposition in Exile, HAVE DECIDED TO REFLECTIVELY REDUCE YOU TO THE RUBBLE that you are---so transparent to others, and yet completely opague to your 'soul', a soul deprived of the insight of a baby.

I eagerly await your next BOTA BATA, INCARNATED EDWARD BLYDEN, LIBERIAN 'NATIVE' HANGMAN.

AUTHORIZED BY THE REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE.

BREAKING NEWS

The Reflective Anti-Soupist Opposition in Exile confirms that the emails allegedly sent from Zimbabwe, criticizing the soupist electioneering of EBK were fabricated by the Editor of the Soupist Rag, Awareness Times.

Our comrades in ZANU/PF are willing, ready and able to provide compelling evidence that the named 'journalist' concocted the whole damn thing to advance her insatiable thirst to be seen in the limelight: soupist limelight.

Accordingly, ZANU/PF, BY AND THROUGH THIS POST, declares the Editor of Awareness Times, Slyvia Blyden, PERSONA NON GRATA in the Sovereign State of Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe cannot be pimped, for it takes no crap from THE WESTERN REACTION, and soupism is a tail of the REACTION.

AUTHORIZED BY THE RELECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE.

Hi there KANGADO JALLOH! Remeber me, your nightmare?

Just wanted to confirm what I suspected of you, that the cyber world is all you got for a life. What a sad and miserable life! I told you to get (any) woman.

Don't bother replying, I will not be reading..... a jarama, Kangado.

Bisi:You need a life too. Why are you so obsessed with palaver. How God make you so ba? How you alaki so? Regardless of the height you reach nar society--People lek you kin end up for die nar gutter lek okuru dog. You bette change you ways. A word for a wise?

My brother in reflection: why bother with an obscurantist?

Don't you see his 'game'?

He wants to waddle in personal crap; we, on the other hand, anti-Soupists until we die, want to disrobe the sedimented political phenomenon called soupism; we want to draw relfective blood from these proxies of proxies, the tails of the tails in Africa of the IMPERIALIST REACTION in the moribund, decadent and financial tsumanamis of Washington-London-Paris.

I have dealt with him in the Gambian site. If he hears one word from me, then we were sired in the same bosom.

I am done with this soupist okuru dog: as, I said, I want the intellectuals of soupism, who are so deadly scared of truth that they would rather sell their dearests into prostitution than debate their alienation from AFRICAN DIGNITY.

The Reflective Anti-Soupist Opposition in Exile.