Karima Brown and Amy Musgrave
25 April 2008
Johannesburg — DEPUTY President Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka has admitted for the first time that SA's growing inequality is "politically unsustainable".
Releasing the annual report of the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for SA (Asgi-SA), Mlambo-Ngcuka appointed herself "commander in chief" of the fight against poverty, saying there was a " crisis" in SA.
"We have not developed a strategy to deal with inequality. The rich have become very rich, both black and white. This is politically and economically unsustainable," she said.
Mlambo-Ngcuka said about 7-million people were "missing" from the country's economy and that the government had to target the youth and women if economic growth was to be shared.
Asgi-SA was designed to address key economic growth constraints. These include infrastructure, the skills shortage, second-economy weaknesses, and the inadequate capacity of government structures to support economic development.
While the government was pleased with the progress of Asgi-SA, in particular its infrastructure investment programme, which is valued at R600bn (only government investment), it acknowledged that the interventions in the second economy had to be improved and speeded up this year.
With less than a year left in office, the Mbeki government plans to unveil an anti-poverty strategy in the next few weeks. It will include details of a poverty line. Other second-economy interventions include redesigning the job-creation project, the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP), which has been criticised for not creating sustainable jobs.
However, the government remains optimistic that it will reach its target of 1-million employment opportunities ahead of the EPWP's deadlines and it reiterated that despite the slowdown in economic growth it would not adjust its growth and development targets.
Mlambo-Ngcuka said she was concerned about the construction industry's ability to go beyond job opportunities created by the building of stadiums for the 2010 Soccer World Cup.
She appealed for more public-private partnerships, saying that business should help provide "exit opportunities" for youngsters. She punted wage subsidies and income transfers for youth, while emphasising that these had to be linked to productive work.
Any move to introduce a wage subsidy is likely to meet with stiff opposition from the Congress of South African Trade Unions, which argues that the measure is an attempt to create a dual labour market and would be open to abuse.
The African National Congress rejected earlier government proposals to introduce a dual labour market for youth.
Presidential adviser Alan Hirsch said the recent income and expenditure survey from Statistics SA showed that the income of the poorest 10% of the population had increased 80%, while the richest 10% had received 40% more.
He dismissed suggestions that SA's growth rate would be negatively affected by the electricity crisis .
"Even if we take the most pessimistic outlook, we still reach our Asgi-SA targets."
Copyright © 2008 Business Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Read comments. Write your own.
I dont know what to believe now anymore, Guys lets just be realistic our leaders have been talking, talking and talking its just a talk show and I dont think it will ever end. Poor people will remain poor in this country, yes a lot of strategies are being put in place but when it comes to implementing them its a serious challenge for our leaders. Worst of all we talk about all these things war against poverty, and others but people on the street will never benefit from all of them.
There is NO SUCH thing as a war on poverty,the U.S.A. started theirs in 1966 and many trillions later still have at least as many as they started with,leaving their social system in bad need of a major overhaul. When you take from one section of the country,this can be done in many ways subsidies etc. through rates etc. and give to the other all you get is a monstrosity which takes +/- 70% of the budget to exist,and give 30% to the poor. (This does not take into account corruption is endemic). The other part is the giver gets… [Read Full Text]